| 权丽丽,刘艳,曲丽霞.单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗妇科疾病的近期疗效[J].安徽医药,2018,22(7):1309-1311. |
| 单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗妇科疾病的近期疗效 |
| The short-term efficacy of conventional laparoscopic surgery and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery applied in the treatment gynecology department disease |
| 投稿时间：2017-04-12 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 腹腔镜检查 卵巢切除术 输卵管切除术 子宫切除术 治疗结果 |
| 英文关键词: Laparoscopy ovariectomy Salpingectomy Hysterectomy Treatment outcome |
| 基金项目:三门峡市科技发展计划项目(2016030311) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2156 |
| 全文下载次数: 604 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 比较单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜手术对异位妊娠、卵巢囊肿、子宫腺肌病患者的近期疗效,评估其临床应用价值。方法 选取三门峡市中心医院2016年7月至2017 年1月收治的符合标准的120例妇科疾病患者,采用随机数字表法分为U-LESS组和CLS组,每例60组,对比分析两者的平均住院时间、切口疼痛率、术后并发症危险程度等近期临床疗效。结果 两组患者在年龄、体质量、身高、子宫大小、孕产次、疾病类型方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者手术均顺利进行,U-LESS组的手术时间(52.7±10.1) min(t=1.221,P=0.225)、术中出血量(25.5±18.3) mL(t=1.542,P=0.126)、术后切口感染率1.7%(χ2=0.26,P=0.61)及术后排气时间(19.7±3.8) h(t=1.88,P=0.063),与CLS组差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)；而平均住院时间(6.1±0.4) d (t=-17.652,P=0.001)、切口疼痛率5.0%(χ2=4.23,P=0.04)、术后发生并发症4例(Z=2.546,P=0.011)比较,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),U-LESS组少于CLS组；结论 单孔腹腔镜手术是一项安全、美观、有效的微创技术,值得在临床推广应用。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To Compare of Short-term efficacy of laparoendoscopic single-site cysts,adenomyoma diseases,which assess of their clinical application value. Methods Selecting 120 cases of Gynecological disease patients which meet the standard from July 2016 to January 2017, these patients are divided into U-LESS group and CLS group according to the principle of random. the use of randomly divided into U-LESSgroup and CLS group,60 cases of each group.To analyze the operative efficacy of the two groups which include average time of hospitalization ,incision pain and the risk of postoperative complications and so on. Results The operation go smoothly of the two groups , the difference is not statistically significant (P>0.05)in comparition of operative time(57.7±10.1) min(t=1.221,P=0.225),intraoperative blood loss(25.5±18.3)mL(t=1.542,P=0.126),postoperative incision infection 1.7%(χ2=0.26,P=0.61) and postoperative exhaust time(19.7±3.8) h(t=1.88,P=0.063).However,the difference is statistically significant (P<0.05) in the average time of hospitalization(6.1±0.4) d(t=-17.652,P=0.001),incision pain 5.0% (χ2=4.23,P=0.04) and postoperative complications in 4 cases (Z=2.546,P=0.011),which U-LESS group are less than CLS group. Conclusions U-LESS is worthy of clinical application,which is a safe,artistic, and effective minimally invasive technique. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
