文章摘要
禚海成,荆炳霞,朱静.外科手术患者术后不同镇痛方式血清细胞因子水平变化分析及临床评价[J].安徽医药,2018,22(10):1894-1897.
外科手术患者术后不同镇痛方式血清细胞因子水平变化分析及临床评价
Clinical evaluation and analysis of the changes of serum cytokines levels in postoperative patients with different analgesia method after surgery
投稿时间:2017-01-13  
DOI:
中文关键词: 镇痛,病人控制  白细胞介素6  白细胞介素8  干扰素γ  肿瘤坏死因子α  消化系统外科手术
英文关键词: Analgesia,patient-controlled  Interleukin-6  Interleukin-8  Interferon-gamma  Tumor necrosis factor-alpha  Digestive system surgical procedures
基金项目:
作者单位
禚海成 常熟市第二人民医院麻醉科,江苏 常熟 215500 
荆炳霞 常熟市医学检验所,江苏 常熟 215500 
朱静 常熟市第二人民医院核医学科,江苏 常熟 215500 
摘要点击次数: 1933
全文下载次数: 645
中文摘要:
      目的 观察普外科手术患者术后不同镇痛方式对血清相关细胞因子的影响,并提出优选的术后镇痛方法。 方法 采用随机数字表法将30例腹部手术患者均分为两组:A组患者术后采用静脉自控镇痛;B组采用镇痛泵进行硬膜外自控镇痛。血清前炎性细胞因子IL-6、IL-8和TNF-α水平测定均采用放射免疫分析法。手术麻醉均采用全麻气管插管加硬膜外麻醉方式。 结果 两组术后镇痛方式患者的血清前炎性细胞因子IL-6、IL-8和TNF-α水平自术后6 h始[A组:(85.03±8.77)pg·mL-1,(12.01±7.23)ng·mL-1,(17.45±7.51)ng·mL-1;B组:(62.10±6.97)pg·mL-1,(8.57±3.01)ng·mL-1,(9.59±4.78)ng·mL-1]升高(t值分别为-6.425,-4.886,-7.102,均P<0.05),峰值均位于24 h[A组:(78.31±7.98)pg·mL-1,(15.17±7.87)ng·mL-1,(20.21±12.23)ng·mL-1;B组:(65.35±4.03)pg·mL-1,(9.41±4.18)ng·mL-1,(12.34±7.92)ng·mL-1],而A组患者均高于B组患者(t值分别为6.481,4.197,6.218,均P<0.05),48 h水平恢复速率B组优于A组(t值分别为9.290,2.612,2.791,均P<0.05)。IFN-γ自术后6 h始下降[A组:(9.01±2.04)μg·mL-1,B组:(12.01±5.04)μg·mL-1,t=-4.098,P<0.05],谷值同位于前炎性细胞因子的时间段(24 h),而A组患者均低于B组患者[A组:(7.52±2.68)μg·mL-1,B组:(11.47±4.87)μg·mL-1,t=-2.092,P<0.05],48h水平恢复速率B组也优于A组(t=-6.284,P<0.05)。自各时点VAS评分结果看,两组术后VAS评分高峰位于6 h处,24 h后下降,6 h和24 h两组VAS评分B组低于A组[A组:(3.72±1.43)分,(3.52±1.29)分,B组:(2.61±0.98)分,(2.21±0.98)分,t=4.293,5.972,均P<0.05]。48 h两组之间差异无统计学意义[A组:(1.17±0.98)分,B组:(1.08±0.95)分,t=-0.838,P>0.05]。两组VAS评分均低于术毕组(均P<0.05)。 结论 两组术后镇痛方式患者都发生不同程度的应激反应,但总体衡量硬膜外自控镇痛优于静脉自控镇痛。
英文摘要:
      Objective To discuss the clinical value of changes of serum related inflammatory cytokine levels in postoperative patients with different analgesia method,and to propose the optimal postoperative analgesia. Methods Thirty patients after surgical operation according to the different methods of analgesia were assigned into 2 groups by the randomized digital method:Group Awas treated by the method of intravenous analgesia, while group Bwas treated by the method of epidural analgesia.The levels of serum IL-6,IL-8,IFN-γ and TNF-α were determined by radioimmunoassay.Surgical anesthesia was performed by tracheal intubation combined with epidural anesthesia. Results The levels of serum IL-6,IL-8,and TNF-α from 6 h after operation were all significantly increased {[group A:(85.03±8.77) pg·mL-1,(12.01±7.23) ng·mL-1,(17.45±7.51) ng·mL-1 vs.[group B:(62.10±6.97) pg·mL-1,(8.57±3.01) ng·mL-1,(9.59±4.78) ng·mL-1]} (t=-6.425,-4.886,-7.102,all P<0.05).Two groups of peaks are located at 24 time periods,the levels of serum IL-6,IL-8,IFN-γ and TNF-α in group Awere significantly higher than those in the group B{[group A:(78.31±7.98) pg·mL-1,(15.17±7.87) ng·mL-1,(20.21±12.23) ng·mL-1] vs.[group B:(65.35±4.03) pg·mL-1,(9.41±4.18) ng·mL-1,(12.34±7.92) ng·mL-1]} (t= 6.481,4.197,6.218,all P<0.05).The recovery rate of serum inflammatory cytokine levels of at 48 h in group Bwas better than that in group A (t=9.290,2.612,2.791,all P<0.05).At the same time,the levels of serum IFN-γ from 6 h after operation were significantly decreased group A:(9.01±2.04) μg·mL-1 vs. group B:(12.01±5.04) μg·mL-1 (t=-4.098,P<0.05).This indexed low peak levels in the 24 h time period.Moreover,levels of serum IFN-γ in group A [(7.52±2.68) μg·mL-1] were significantly lower than that in the group B [(11.47±4.87) μg·mL-1] (t=-2.092,P<0.05).The recovery rate of serum levels at 48 h in group Bwas better than that in group A (t=-6.284,P<0.05).From the VAS scores at each time point,the VAS scores of the two groups were at 6 h,and decreased after 24 h VAS scores at 6 h and 24 h [(2.61±0.98) points,(2.21±0.98) points] wereas significantly lower than those in group A [(3.72±1.43) points,(3.52±1.29) points] (t=4.293,5.972,all P<0.05),and there was no significantly difference atin 48 h data [group A:(1.17±0.98) points vs. group B:(1.08±0.95) points,(t=-0.838,P>0.05]).The VAS scores of the two groups were lower than those of the surgery group (all P<0.05). Conclusions Two groups of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing different degrees of stress reaction,but the overall analgesic effect of Bgroup was significantly better than group A.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮