| 姚雪峰,刘力伟,孙宝硕,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉和 InterTAN髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间反斜型骨折的疗效比较[J].安徽医药,2019,23(11):2248-2250. |
| 股骨近端防旋髓内钉和 InterTAN髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间反斜型骨折的疗效比较 |
| Efficacy of proximal femoral nail antirotation and Inter TAN in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric oblique fracture |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1009?6469.2019.11.034◇临床医学◇ |
| 中文关键词: 髋骨折 股骨粗隆间反斜形骨折 股骨近端防旋髓内钉 InterTAN髓内钉 |
| 英文关键词: Hip fractures Femoral intertrochanteric oblique fracture PFNA intramedullary nail InterTAN intramedullary nail |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2186 |
| 全文下载次数: 609 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的比较股骨近端防旋髓内钉( proximal femoral nail antirotation，PFNA)和 InterTAN髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间反斜形骨折的疗效差异。方法回顾性分析 2015年 1月至 2016年 6月保定第七医院采用 PFNA和 InterTAN两种髓内钉治疗股骨反转子间斜行骨折共 64例病人的临床资料，其中 PFNA组 39例， InterTAN组 25例。比较两组一般资料、术前美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、受伤前活动水平以及手术切口长度、手术时间、术中失血量、住院时间、 Harris评分、完全负重时间。结果两组术前 ASA分级、受伤前活动状态及手术切口长度、住院时间、 Harris评分，均差异无统计学意义( P＞0.05)； PFNA组在手术时间(59.3±7.6)min、术中失血量( 167.6±96.2)mL方面，优于 InterTAN组( 76.1±9.4)min、(249.1±87.3)mL(P＜0.05)；在完全负重时间方面， InterTAN组( 8.7±3.4)周优于 PFNA组( 11.3±2.7)周( P＜0.05)。结论 PFNA和 InterTAN两种髓内钉均有出血较少、固定牢固、并发症少等优点，但又各有优势。 PFNA髓内钉技术较为成熟、操作方便、组织损伤小，临床应用广泛；而 InterTAN髓内钉稳定性较高，为近年新发展的术式，临床应用前景更为广阔。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To compare the efficacy of proximal femoral nail antirotation(PFNA)and InterTAN intramedullary nail in the treatment of intertrochanteric synovial fracture of the femur.Methods The clinical data of 64 patients with femoral anterogradeoblique fracture treated with PFNA and InterTAN were analyzed retrospectively from January 2015 to June 2016.Among them，39 cases were treated with PFNA and 25 cases with InterTAN.The time of ASA classification，the level of preoperative injury，the length of operation，the time of operation，the amount of blood loss during operation，the time of hospitalization，the Harris score and the complete weight?bearing time were compared between the two groups.Results There were no significant difference between the two groups in general data，preoperative ASA classification，pre?injury activity level，the length of incision，length of hospitalization and Harris score(P＞0.05).PFNA group were superior than InterTAN group in average operation time［( 59.3±7.6)min vs.(76.1± 9.4)min］and intraoperative blood loss［(167.6±96.2)mL vs.(249.1±87.3)mL］(P＜0.05).InterTAN group were better than PFNA group in complete weight?bearing time［( 8.7±3.4)w vs.(11.3±2.7)w］( P＜0.05).Conclusion Both PFNA and InterTAN intra? medullary nail have the advantages of less bleeding，firm fixation and less complication，with their own advantages.PFNA intramed? ullary nail technology is more mature，easy to operate，tissue damage is small and application is extensive.InterTAN intramedullary nail stability is high，which is the new development of the operation in recent years and application has yet to be improved.PFNAand InterTAN intramedullary nail both could achieve a solid fixed requirements，InterTAN intramedullary nail application prospects is more broad. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
