| 孙旭,廖小红,蔡庆群,等.基于德尔菲法构建中药学硕士专业学位人才指标体系[J].安徽医药,2021,25(12):2531-2537. |
| 基于德尔菲法构建中药学硕士专业学位人才指标体系 |
| Construction of talent cultivation mode for Master of Chinese Materia Medica based on Delphi method |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2021.12.046 |
| 中文关键词: 教育，药学，研究生 德尔菲法 中草药 人才培养模式 指标体系 调查和问卷 |
| 英文关键词: Education, pharmacy, graduate Delphi method Drugs, Chinese herbal Talent cultivation mode Indicator sys. tem Surveys and questionnaires |
| 基金项目:广州中医药大学第一临床医学院研究生创新教育研究课题( 2019YJS11) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1136 |
| 全文下载次数: 389 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的评价中药学制剂研究与开发方向硕士专业学位研究生的培养指标体系。方法在文献调研的基础上，运用 Delphi法对 25名相关领域专家采用 Email和现场发放调查问卷 2种方式进行两轮咨询，采用 SPSS 19.0软件对问卷条目进行统计，并对专家积极程度、权威程度、意见协调程度进行分析。结果两轮问卷的专家积极性分别为 88%和 100%，专家权威程度分别为 0.884 8和 0.900 8(P<0.01)Kendall′s W协调系数分别为 0.256和 0.472(P<0.01)初步确立培养目标、入学条件、课程和学分设置、专业实践、培养方式和评价，指标 6个要素及其延伸的 23个一级指标和 67个二级，指标，其中一级指标重要性评分均 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To assess the training system of master degree postgraduates on research and development of Chinese phar. maceutical preparations.Methods On the basis of literature research, Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of consultations on 25 experts in related fields with Email and questionnaire field investigation. SPSS 19.0 software was used to input the data of thequestionnaire and establish the database, and the experts′enthusiasm degree, the authority degree and opinion coordination degreewere analyzed statistically.Results The positive coefficients of expert consultation in the first and second rounds of questionnaire con.sultation were 88% and 100%, respectively; the authority degrees of experts were 0.884 8 and 0.900 8, respectively (P<0.01); the Kend. all′s W were 0.256 and 0.472, respectively (P<0.01). Six dimensions including the training goal, admission requirements, curriculum,clinical practice arrangement, training mode and quality evaluation, and their corresponding 23 primary indicators and 67 secondary in.dicators were established. Among them, the mean value of importance scoring of first-level indicators ranged from 4.00 to 5.00, the ap.proval rating ranged from 72.73% to 100.00%, and the coefficient of variation ranged from 0.00 to 0.191. While the mean value of im.portance scoring of second-level indicators ranged from 3.73 to 4.91, the approval rating ranged from 54.55% to 100.00%, and variationcoefficient ranged from 0.060 to 0.207.Conclusions The expert′s representative and consistency are acceptable. They also have highresponse rates and authorities coeffcient. The construction of the index system can provide a basis for the syllabus of professional mas.ter degree of Chinese materia medica. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
