| 田添,胡文军,孙翠玲,等.快速现场评价在颈部淋巴结细针穿刺中的应用价值[J].安徽医药,2020,24(5):966-969. |
| 快速现场评价在颈部淋巴结细针穿刺中的应用价值 |
| Application value of rapid on?site evaluation in fine needle aspiration of neck lymph nodes |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1009?6469.2020.05.030 |
| 中文关键词: 活组织检查，细针/方法 淋巴结 病理学 颈 显微镜检查 快速现场评价 |
| 英文关键词: Biopsy,fine?needle/methods Lymph nodes Pathology Neck Microscopy Rapid on?site evaluation |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1736 |
| 全文下载次数: 989 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的探讨快速现场评价( rapid on?site evaluation，ROSE)指导下的颈部淋巴结细针穿刺( fine?needle aspiration，FNA)与常规 FNA在效果和安全性上的差异。方法选取 2013年 10月至 2018年 10月阜阳市人民医院拟行颈部淋巴结 FNA的病人 84例，采用随机数字表法分为 ROSE组和常规组，对穿刺针数、穿刺是否明确诊断、穿刺并发症进行观察。结果 ROSE组总体明确诊断率( 97.6%比 81.0%)、并发症发生率( 7.1%比 23.8%)、穿刺进针次数［(1.24±0.58)次比( 1.90±0.58)次］均优于常规组( P＜0.05)；对于长径小于 1cm或位于 IV区的淋巴结， ROSE组在明确诊断率上优于常规组；淋巴结位于 IV区的病人， ROSE的并发症发生率优于常规组。结论应用 ROSE技术有助于提高颈部淋巴结 FNA的成功率和安全性。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective The difference in efficiency and safety between conventional fine?needle aspiration(FNA)and FNA with the guidance of rapid on?site evaluation(ROSE)was investigated.Methods Eighty?four patients with enlarged neck lymph nodeswere randomly divided into the ROSE group and the conventional group between October 2013 and October 2018.The difference ofpuncture times，diagnosis rate and complication rate between these two groups was studied.Results The diagnosis rate(97.6% vs.81.0%)，complication rate(7.1% vs. 23.8%)and puncture times［(1.24±0.58)vs.(1.90±0.58)］in the neck lymph node examinationof ROSE group were better than those in the conventional FNA group.For the lymph nodes with longitudinal diameter less than 1cm or in level IV，a higher diagnosis rate of puncture results was shown in the ROSE group.A higher incidence of complications inthe conventional group was proved in patients with lymph nodes in level IV.Conclusion The diagnosis rate and safety of FNA in neck lymph nodes examination can be improved by the application of ROSE. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
