文章摘要
李笑蕾,韩琳.谷氨酰胺联合序贯肠内营养治疗对重症脑梗死病人营养状态与预后的影响[J].安徽医药,2020,24(9):1871-1875.
谷氨酰胺联合序贯肠内营养治疗对重症脑梗死病人营养状态与预后的影响
Effects of glutamine combined with sequential enteral nutrition on nutritional status and prognosis of patients with severe cerebral infarction
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2020.09.045
中文关键词: 脑梗死  肠道营养  谷氨酰胺  序贯肠内营养治疗  营养状态  预后
英文关键词: Brain infarction  Enteral nutrition  Glutamine  Sequential enteral nutrition therapy  Nutritional status  Prognosis
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
李笑蕾 吉林大学中日联谊医院神经内科吉林长春 130033  
韩琳 吉林大学中日联谊医院神经内科吉林长春 130033 hanhui25450@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 1683
全文下载次数: 504
中文摘要:
      目的探究谷氨酰胺联合序贯肠内营养治疗对重症脑梗死病人营养状态与预后的影响。方法选取 2016年 3月至 2018年 4月吉林大学中日联谊医院收治的重症脑梗死病人 94例,采用随机数字表法将其分为观察组与对照组,对照组采用序贯肠内营养治疗,观察组采用谷氨酰胺联合序贯肠内营养治疗,对比两组病人营养状态、免疫功能及预后情况。结果入院第 1天,两组病人肱三头肌皮褶厚度( TSF)、上臂三头肌肌围( MAMC)、血清前白蛋白( PAB)、血清白蛋白( ALB)及血红蛋白( Hb)指标相比差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)入院第 15天,两组病人各营养指标均有所下降,但观察组下降幅度较小,且观察组 TSF、MAMC、PAB、ALB及 Hb指标均明显高,于对照组[(14.02±3.88)mm比( 12.12±3.46)mm(t=2.506,P=0.014)、(24.33±3.38) cm比( 21.82±2.41)cm(t=4.145,P<0.001)、(188.26±16.17)mg/L比( 147.65±14.39)mg/L(t=12.862,P<0.001)、(36.20±3.75)g/L比( 34.12±3.26)g/L(t=2.870,P=0.005)、(127.84±18.46)g/L比( 118.05±19.21)g/L(t=2.514,P=0.014)];入院第 1天,两组病人免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)、免疫球蛋白 A(IgA)及免疫球蛋白 M(IgM)水平相比差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)入院第 15天,观察组 IgG、IgA及 IgM水平均显著高于对照组[(15.32±2.71)g/L比( 12.08±2.16)g/L(t=6.410,P<0.001)、(2.65±0.4,8)g/L比( 1.93±0.55) g/L(t=6.762,P<0.001)、(1.26±0.27)g/L比 g/L(1.05±0.33)(t=3.377,P=0.001)];入院第 15天,观察组神经功能缺损分级量表(NIHSS)评分( 8.12±2.43)分显著低于对照组( 10.59±2.26)分( t=5.103,P<0.001);观察组总感染率显著低于对照组( P<0.05)。结论谷氨酰胺联合序贯肠内营养治疗可有效改善重症脑梗死病人营养状态,提高免疫功能,降低感染率,改善近期预后。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the effect of glutamine combined with sequential enteral nutrition therapy on nutritional statusand prognosis of patients with severe cerebral infarction.Methods 94 patients with severe cerebral infarction admitted to China-Ja- pan Friendship Hospital of Jilin University from March 2016 to April 2018 were selected,they were divided into observation group and control group by random number table,the control group was treated with sequential enteral nutrition,while the observation group was treated with glutamine combined with sequential enteral nutrition,the nutritional status,immune function and prognosis of the two groups were compared.Results On the first day of admission,there were no significant differences in triceps skinfold(TSF),mid-arm muscle circumference(MAMC),serum prealbumin(PAB),serum albumin(ALB)and hemoglobin(Hb)between the two groups(P>0.05),on the 15th day of admission,the nutritional indicators of both groups decreased,but the decrease of the observation group was small,and the TSF,MAMC,PAB,ALB and Hb indicators of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group,(14.02±3.88)mm vs.(12.12±3.46)mm(t=2.506,P=0.014),(24.33±3.38)cm vs.(21.82±2.41)cm(t=4.145,P<0.001)(188.26±16.17)mg/L vs.(147.65±14.39)mg/L(t=12.862,P<0.001),(36.20±3.75)g/L vs.(34.12±3.26)g/L(t=2.870,P=0.005),(,127.84±18.46)g/L vs.(118.05±19.21)g/L(t=2.514,P=0.014); on the 1st day of admission,there was no significant difference in the levels of immunoglobulin G(IgG),immunoglobulin A(IgA)and immunoglobulin M(IgM)between the two groups(P>0.05),on the 15th day of admission,the levels of IgG,IgA and IgM in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05); on the 15th day of admission,the National Institute of Health stroke scale 、
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮