| 唐正中,胡宗涛,吴爱东,等.肺部小肿瘤γ刀、静态IMRT及VMAT放疗剂量学比较[J].安徽医药,2016,20(1):70-73. |
| 肺部小肿瘤γ刀、静态IMRT及VMAT放疗剂量学比较 |
| Comparison of dose distribution in body gamma knife, static intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for small mass in lung |
| 投稿时间：2015-08-19 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 肺肿瘤/放射治疗 体部γ刀 静态调强放射治疗 容积旋转调强放疗 剂量学 |
| 英文关键词: lung cancer/radiotherapy body gamma knife static intensity modulated radiotherapy volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy dosimetry |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2978 |
| 全文下载次数: 136 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 比较体部γ刀、静态调强(sIMRT)与容积旋转调强(VMAT)的肺部小肿瘤中放疗计划的剂量学差异。方法 选择16例肺部小肿瘤患者,分别设计γ刀、sIMRT(计划2)和VMAT计划,使得95%靶体积(PTV)达到处方剂量要求,比较三种计划的靶区剂量、危及器官剂量、均匀指数(HI)及适形指数(CI)的差异。结果 16例患者三种计划的PTV剂量分布及剂量参数都能达到临床治疗要求,处方剂量覆盖95%的PTV,危及器官的剂量限值也能满足要求。γ刀计划的适形性(CI)及均匀性(HI)分别为(1.67±0.13)和(0.70±0.06),在三种计划中表现为最差(P＜0.05)；而sIMRT和VMAT计划的PTV靶区适形性和均匀性相似,差别不明显(t=0.96和1.37,P=0.36和0.19)。在三种计划中,γ刀计划的全肺V5、V10、V15、V20、V25、V30和脊髓Dmax最低,差异显著(P=0.00),而食管Dmax虽然较低,但并无统计学意义。sIMRT和VMAT相比,肺V10、V30略低,且有统计学意义,而食管及脊髓最大受照剂量、肺V5、V15、V20、V25虽然差异不大(P>0.05),但VMAT计划均高于sIMRT计划相应参数值。结论 与sIMRT和VMAT相比,在肺部小肿瘤的放疗中,γ刀能明显提高靶区剂量且较好保护危及器官,但均匀性及适形性较差。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To explore dose distribution difference in body gamma knife,static intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for small mass in lung. Methods Sixteen patients with small mass in lung were enrolled in the study, gamma knife radiotherapy plan, sIMRT plan and VMAT plan made respectively for each mass. All plans were optimized to meet the requirement of 95% target volume (PTV) covered by prescribed dose. We compared multiple parameters such as dosimetric parameters of PTV, organ at risk(OAR), homogeneity index(HI) and comfomity index(CI) of three radiotherapy plans.Results Sixteen cases with three plans of PTV dose distribution and dose parameters could meet the requirements of clinical treatment, and prescription dose to cover 95% of the PTV, OAR dose limit could also meet the requirements. The Homogeneity index (CI) and conformity index (HI) of Gamma knife plan were 1.67±0.13 and 0.70±0.06,respectively, which had the worst performance among three plans(P＜0.05)；the homogeneity index(HI) and conformity index(CI) of PTV in sIMRT and VMAT plan were similar, without obvious difference (t=0.96 and 1.37,P=0.36 and 0.19, respectively). The whole lung V5, V10, V15, V20, V25,V30 and spinal cord Dmax were the lowest in gamma knife plan withsignificant difference (P=0.00). Although the esophagus Dmax was lower, it had no statistical significance. Compared with VMAT, lung V10, V30 of sIMRT were slightly lower with statistical significance. All the parameters of VMAT plan were higher than those of sIMRT although the Dmax of esophagus and spinal cord, lung V5, V15, V20, V25 were not significantly different (P>0.05). Conclusions Compared with sIMRT and VMAT, gamma knife radiotherapy for the treatment of small mass in lung can obviously increase the target dose and better protect OAR, but is poor in homogeneity and conformity. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
