| 董琳,汪曲,涂丹娜,等.Vojta疗法联合语言认知训练在全面发育落后儿童中的临床应用[J].安徽医药,2020,24(5):908-911. |
| Vojta疗法联合语言认知训练在全面发育落后儿童中的临床应用 |
| Clinical effect of Vojta therapy combined with language cognitive training on global development delay in children |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1009?6469.2020.05.015 |
| 中文关键词: 儿童发育障碍，广泛性 认知疗法 姿势平衡 语言疗法 语言认知训练 Vojta疗法 |
| 英文关键词: Child development disorders,pervasive Cognitive therapy Postural balance Language therapy Languagecognitive training Vojta therapy |
| 基金项目:湖北省卫计委基金项目(2015CFB660) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2395 |
| 全文下载次数: 1028 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的探讨 Vojta疗法联合语言认知训练对全面发育落后( GDD)病儿的临床应用价值，进一步为临床康复方法的选择提供依据。方法选取 2017年 6月至 2018年 6月黄冈市中心医院接收的 73例 GDD病儿为受试对象，根据随机数表法将其分为对照组 36例和观察组 37例，其中对照组只采用语言认知训练，观察组在语言认知训练的基础上联合 Vojta疗法。采用 Gesell发育量表、 S?S语言发育落后评价法( S?S法)及 PEABODY运动发育量表的 5项指标分别对两组病儿的语言 DQ及 PEABODY运动发育量表进行评分，对两组不同干预措施的效果进行比较。结果治疗前，与对照组相比，观察组病儿童的语言认知能力［(47.49±0.175)%比( 47.99±0.327)%］及运动能力［(53.44±0.307)%比( 52.83±0.200)%］比较，差异无统计学意义( P＞0.05)；治疗后，观察组病儿的语言认知能力［(61.79±0.141)%比( 56.81±0.302)%］及运动能力［(63.76±0.205)%比(61.48±0.190)%］均优于对照组，差异有统计学意义( P＜0.05)。结论对 GDD病儿在语言认知训练的基础上给予 Vojta疗法可明显改善病儿语言认知和运动能力的康复效果，具有临床应用价值。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To explore the clinical effects of Vojta therapy combined with language cognitive training in children withglobal develepment delay(GDD)and to provide a basis for the selection of clinical rehabilitation methods.Methods 73 children with GDD received in our hospital from June 2017 to June 2018 were randomly divided into the control group(n＝36)and the ob? servation group(n＝37).The control group was only treated with language cognitive training，and the experimental group was treat?ed with Vojta therapy on the basis of language cognitive training.The language DQ and PEABODY motor development scales of thetwo groups were scored by Gesell development scale，S?S language retardation evaluation method(S?S method)and PEABODY mo? tor development scale，respectively，and the effects of different intervention measures were compared between the two groups.Re? sults Before treatment，compared with the control group，the language cognitive ability［(47.49±0.175)% vs.(47.99±0.327)%］and motor ability［(53.44±0.307)% vs.(52.83±0.200)%］of the experimental group were not significantly improved(P＞0.05)，howev? er，the language cognitive ability［( 61.79±0.141)% vs.(56.81±0.302)%］and motor ability［( 63.76±0.205)% vs.(61.48± |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
