| 张帅,张卓,张韩瑜嘉,等.微小 RNA-125a-3p介导 Notch1信号通路对骨质疏松性骨折大鼠愈合过程的影响[J].安徽医药,2021,25(3):546-552. |
| 微小 RNA-125a-3p介导 Notch1信号通路对骨质疏松性骨折大鼠愈合过程的影响 |
| Effects of mir-125a-3p mediated Notch1 signaling pathway on the healing process of osteoporotic fractures in rats |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2021.03.028 |
| 中文关键词: 骨质疏松性骨折 骨折愈合 核糖核酸酶类 受体， Notch1 miR-125a-3p 骨密度 生物力学 大鼠， Wistar |
| 英文关键词: Osteoporotic fractures Fracture healing Ribonucleases Receptor, Notch1 MiRNA-125a-3p Bone mineral density Biomechanics Rats, Wistar |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1393 |
| 全文下载次数: 418 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的探讨微小核糖核酸( miR)-125a-3p靶向介导 Notch1信号通路对 Wistar大鼠骨质疏松性骨折愈合的影响。方法 6月龄 Wistar大鼠 58只，假手术组 8只(假手术组)，其余 50只鼠切除卵巢建立骨质疏松大鼠模型，测骨密度验证模型成立，手术建立一侧股骨中点骨折模型，克氏针固定。去除模型不成功大鼠后分组转染，每组 8只，包括:模型组、 inhibitor NC组(转再染抑制剂阴性对照组)、 miR-125a-3p inhibitor组(转染 miR-125a-3p抑制剂)、 si-Notch1组(转染 Notch si-RNA干扰)、 miR-125a3p inhibitor+si-Notch1组( miR-125a-3p抑制剂及 Notch1 si-RNA联用组)。大鼠饲养 8周后取断端组织，实时定量逆转录聚合酶链反应( qRT-PCR)检测 miR-125a-3p及 Notch1的表达，过生物信息学网站预测及双荧光素酶报告实验检测 miR-125a-3p与 Notch1的靶向作用，病理组织学及免疫组化观察、骨密度及生物力学测量共同分析各组骨折愈合情况。结果模型组较假手术组骨密度下降( P<0.05)。与假手术组相比，模型组中 miR-125a-3p表达量( 1.48±0.11)均上调， Notch1表达( 0.75±0.02)下调(P<0.05)。 miR-125a-3p mimic与野生型 Notch1-WT共转染组中荧光素酶活性强度［萤火虫荧光素酶(0.58±0.02)］下降(P<0.05)。与 inhibitor NC组相比， miR-125a-3p inhibitor组( 0.62±0.29)及 miR-125a-3p inhibitor+si-Notc1组( 0.73±0.21)表达下调( P <0.05)。与 inhibitor NC组相比， miR-125a-3p inhibitor组 Notch1表达( 0.93±0.35)提高， si-Notch1组( 0.40±0.15)表达降低( P<0.05)。与 si-Notch1组相比， miR-125a-3p inhibitor+si-Notc1组( 0.79±0.33)Notch1表达提高( P<0.05)。转染 8周后，假手术组骨小梁开始大量形成，厚度均匀，排列紧密、方向一致。模型组、 inhibitor NC组骨细胞数大量减少，骨小梁较细，间隙较大且排列紊乱。 miR-125a-3p inhibitor组骨小梁厚度增加，骨细胞数增多，骨质改善，与假手术组显微形态较为相似。 si-Notch组骨细胞数大量缺失，骨小梁间隙极大，显微结构较模型组病理形态更明显。 miR-125a-3p inhibitor+si-Notc1组介于 miR-125a-3p inhibi? tor组与 si-Notch1组间，骨小梁厚度有所增加。同 inhibitor NC组相比， miR-125a-3p inhibitor组( 120.60±6.65)阳性表达增加， siNotch1组( 60.60±2.84)减少( P<0.05)。同 miR-125a-3p inhibitor组相比， miR-125a-3p inhibitor+si-Notc1组阳性细胞表达( 78.00±2.27)降低，与 si-Notch1组相比增多( P<0.05)。第 4、6、8周，同假手术组相比，模型组( 104.25±10.52、110.25±13.03、116.75±10.59)骨密度下降( P<0.05)。同 inhibitor NC组相比， miR-125a-3p inhibitor组( 119.02±9.55、131.25±10.57、146.75±12.47)骨密度上升， si-Notch1组降低( P<0.05)。同 miR-125a-3p inhibitor组相比， miR-125a-3p inhibitor+si-Notc1组各项骨生物力学指标下降(P<0.05)。同假手术组相比，模型组各项骨生物力学指标，包括最大负载、极限应力及剪切应力下降( P<0.05)；同 inhibitor NC组相比， miR-125a-3p inhibitor组［最大负载:(125.01±12.05)N；极限应力:(86.75±5.11)Mpa；剪切应力:(1.62±0.34)N/mm2］各项骨生物力学指标上升， si-Notch1组降低( P<0.05)。同 miR-125a-3p inhibitor组相比， miR-125a-3p inhibitor+si-Notc1组［最大负载:(95.02±8.41)N；极限应力:(56.52±4.95)Mpa；剪切应力:(1.30±0.17)N/mm2］各项骨生物力学指标下降；与 si-Notch1组相比上升(均 P < 0.05)。结论抑制 miR-125a-3p可以促进 Notch1表达，增加 BMP-2的阳性表达、增强骨密度及生物力学强度，进而促进骨质疏松性 Wistar大鼠骨折愈合。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective This study aims to investigate the roles of miR-125a-3p in the osteoporotic fracture recovery in Wistar rats via regulating the Notch1 signaling pathway.Methods Fifty-five 6-month old Wistar rats were included in this study. 8 rats were subject? ed to sham-surgery group, while the remaining 50 rats were ovariectomized for osteoporotic rat model establishment. The bone mineral density was measured for model identification. The model rats were further used for fracture inducement at the midpoint of one-side fe? mur and fixed with K-wire. After removing the unsuccessful model rats, the rats were transfected in groups, each with 8 rats, including:Sham, Model, inhibitor NC, miR-125a-3p inhibitor, si-Notch1 and miR-125-3p + si-Notch-1 groups. The tissues from the broken ends were collected 8weeks later, and then the expression of miR-125a-3p and Notch was determined using RT-qPCR. Target relation be? tween miR-125a-3p and Notch1 was predicted via bio-information analysis and dual luciferase reporter gene assay. The bone recoveryfrom fracture was detected using histopathology analysis, Immunohistochemistry, bone mineral density and biomechanics measure?ments.Results The BMD of model group was lower than that of sham operation group (P < 0.05). Compared with sham group, the ex? pression of mir-125a-3p was up-regulated (1.48 ± 0.11) and Notch1 was down regulated (0.75 ± 0.02) in model group (P < 0.05). The lu? ciferase activity intensity [firefly luciferase (0.58 ± 0.02)] decreased in the co transfection group of mir-125a-3p mimic and wild-type Notch1 WT (P < 0.05). Compared with the inhibitor NC group, the expression of mir-125a-3p inhibitor group (0.62 ± 0.29) and mir125a-3p inhibitor + Si notc1 group (0.73 ± 0.21) were down regulated (P < 0.05). Compared with the inhibitor NC group, the expression of Notch1 in mir-125a-3p inhibitor group (0.93 ± 0.35) was increased, while that in Si Notch1 group (0.40 ± 0.15) was decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with si-notch1 group, the expression of Notch1 in mir-125a-3p inhibitor + si-notchc1 group was (0.79 ± 0.33) (P < 0.05). After 8 weeks of transfection, a large number of trabeculae began to form in sham group, with uniform thickness, close arrange?ment and consistent direction. In model group and inhibitor NC group, the number of osteocytes decreased significantly, the trabecularbone was thinner, the gap was larger and the arrangement was disordered. In mir-125a-3p inhibitor group, the thickness of trabecularbone increased, the number of osteocytes increased, and the bone improved, which was similar to that in sham group. In Si notch group,the number of osteoblasts was largely absent, and the trabecular space was extremely large, and the microstructure was more obviousthan that in model group. Mir-125a-3p inhibitor + si-notchc1 group was between mir-125a-3p inhibitor group and si-notch1 group, and trabecular thickness increased. Compared with the inhibitor NC group, the positive expression of mir-125a-3p inhibitor group (120.60 ± 6.65) increased, while that of Si Notch1 group (60.60 ± 2.84) decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with the mir-125a-3p inhibitor group, the expression of positive cells in the mir-125a-3p inhibitor + si-notchc1 group was (78.00 ± 2.27) lower, and increased compared with the si-notch1 group (P < 0.05). Compared with sham group, BMD of model group [(104.25 ± 10.52), (110.25 ± 13.03), (116.75 ± 10.59) ]de?creased at 4, 6 and 8 weeks (P < 0.05). Compared with the inhibitor NC group, the bone mineral density of mir-125a-3p inhibitor group [(119.02 ± 9.55), (131.25 ± 10.57), (146.75 ± 12.47)] increased, while that of si-notch1 group decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with mir125a-3p inhibitor group, the bone biomechanical indexes of mir-125a-3p inhibitor + Si notc1 group were decreased (P < 0.05). Com?pared with sham group, the biomechanical parameters of model group, including maximum load, ultimate stress and shear stress, de?creased (P < 0.05); compared with inhibitor NC group, mir-125a-3p decreased (P < 0.05) In the inhibitor group [maximum load:(125.01 ± 12.05)N; ultimate stress: (86.75 ± 5.11)MPA; shear stress: (1.62 ± 0.34)N/mm2] all bone biomechanical indexes increased,but decreased in the si-notch1 group (P<0.05). Compared with the mir-125a-3p inhibitor group, the bone biomechanical indexes of the |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
