文章摘要
时明涛.置管溶栓结合多种腔内介入术治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症 48例效果观察[J].安徽医药,2022,26(7):1445-1448.
置管溶栓结合多种腔内介入术治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症 48例效果观察
Effects of catheter thrombolysis combined with multiple endovascular interventions in the treatment of 48 cases of lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2022.07.040
中文关键词: 闭塞性动脉硬化  机械溶栓  尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物  支架  置管溶栓  腔内介入术  下肢  踝肱指数  神经传导速度
英文关键词: Arteriosclerosis obliterans  Mechanical thrombolysis  Urokinase-type plasminogen activator  Stents  Catheter thrombolysis  Endovascular intervention  Lower extremity  Ankle-brachial index  Nerve conduction velocity
基金项目:
作者单位
时明涛 南阳市中心医院血管外科河南南阳 473000 
摘要点击次数: 987
全文下载次数: 254
中文摘要:
      目的探讨置管溶栓结合多种腔内介入术治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症( ASO)病人的临床效果。方法回顾性分析 2017年 5月至 2019年 5月南阳市中心医院收治的下肢 ASO病人的临床资料,直接行腔内介入的病人中选择 48例为对照组,置管溶栓后行腔内介入治疗的病人中选择 48例为观察组。观察两组病人手术前后临床症状[足部皮温、足趾血氧饱和度(SO2)、踝肱指数( ABI)、视觉模拟评分( VAS)]、足背动脉血流动力学指标(血管内径、血流量、血流峰速)、下肢神经传导速度(运动神经传导速度、感觉神经传导速度)变化情况,比较两组治疗效果(支架置入率、截肢率、并发症发生率)、临床观察指标(手术时间、后住院时间)差异性。结果术后 1个月,观察组和对照组病人足部皮温[(16.25±2.17)℃比( 27.67±3.27)℃,(15.81±2.41)℃比术(26.84±3.56)℃]、足趾 SO2[( 25.31±5.64)%比( 87.16±8.3)%,(24.71±5.97)%比( 85.64±6.84)%]、 ABI[( 0.23±0.10)比( 0.83± 0.12),(0.25±0.09)比( 0.85±0.11)]均较术前升高( P<0.05)VAS评分[( 7.15±1.62)分比( 0.98±0.16)分,(7.02±1.59)分比( 1.02± 0.15)分]、血流峰速[(51.67±9.23)cm/s比( 40.75±7.19)cm/s,(,52.64±8.71)cm/s比( 41.62±7.62)cm/s]则较术前降低( P<0.05),血管内径、血流量和下肢运动神经传导速度、感觉神经传导速度均较术前增加( P<0.05);观察组病人支架置入率、截肢率分别为
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the clinical effect of catheter thrombolysis combined with multiple endovascular interventionsin the treatment of patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO).Methods The clinical data of lower extremity ASOpatients admitted to Nanyang Central Hospital from May 2017 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Forty-eight patients who un-derwent direct endovascular intervention were selected as the control group, and the 48 patients who underwent endovascular interven-tion after catheter thrombolysis were selected as the observation group. The clinical symptoms [foot skin temperature, toe oxygen satura-tion (SO2), ankle-brachial index (ABI), visual analog scale (VAS)], dorsal artery hemodynamic indexes (vascular diameter, blood flowvolume, blood flow peak velocity) and lower extremity nerve conduction velocity (motor nerve conduction velocity, sensory nerve con-duction velocity) changes of the two groups of patients before and after surgery were observed, and the therapeutic effects (stent place-ment rate, amputation rate, complication rate) and clinical observation indicators (operation time, postoperative hospital stay) were com-pared between the two groups.Results One month after operation, the skin temperature of the feet of the patients [(16.25±2.17)℃ vs. (27.67±3.27)℃, (15.81±2.41)℃ vs. (26.84±3.56)℃], toe SO2 [(25.31±5.64)% vs. (87.16±8.3)%, (24.71±5.97)% vs. (85.64±6.84)%] and ABI [(0.23±0.10) vs. (0.83±0.12), (0.25±0.09) vs. (0.85±0.11)] in the observation group and the control group were higher than those be-fore operation (P < 0.05); the VAS score [(7.15±1.62) points vs. (0.98±0.16) points, (7.02±1.59) points vs. (1.02±0.15) points] and blood flow peak velocity [(51.67±9.23) cm/s vs. (40.75±7.19) cm/s, (52.64±8.71) cm/s vs. (41.62±7.62) cm/s] were lower than those before op-eration (P < 0.05); the vascular diameter, blood flow volume, lower extremity motor nerve conduction velocity and sensory nerve conduc-tion velocity were higher than those before operation (P < 0.05). The stent placement rate and amputation rate were 16.67% (8/48) and 2.08% (1/48), respectively, in the observation group, which were lower than those in the control group, which were 43.75% (21/48) and16.67% (8/48) (P < 0.05); The operation time [(2.05±0.56) h vs (4.12±1.03) h] and postoperative hospital stay [(10.32±2.45) d vs(15.18±3.17) d] were shorter than those in the control group, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the inci-dence of complications among patients (P > 0.05).Conclusions Catheter thrombolysis combined with multiple endovascular interven-tions and single endovascular intervention for lower extremity ASO can effectively improve the clinical symptoms of patients, increasethe blood flow volume of the dorsal artery and the lower extremity nerve conduction velocity, and have few complications. Catheterthrombolysis can reduce stent placement and amputation, with low time cost and high clinical value.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮