| 张晟,胡方琪,王成,等.三碘甲状腺原氨酸在脑外伤预后模型中的研究价值[J].安徽医药,2023,27(1):125-130. |
| 三碘甲状腺原氨酸在脑外伤预后模型中的研究价值 |
| The value of triiodothyronine in the prognostic model of traumatic brain injury |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2023.01.028 |
| 中文关键词: 脑损伤 预后模型 三碘甲状腺原氨酸 |
| 英文关键词: Brain injuries Prognostic model Triiodothyronine |
| 基金项目:江苏省第十四批“六大高峰”高层次人才选拔培养资助方案( WSW-166) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1448 |
| 全文下载次数: 557 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的探究三碘甲状腺原氨酸纳入脑外伤预后模型中的可行性。方法回顾性分析 2018年 6月至 2021年 5月徐州医科大学附属连云港医院收治 319例神经外科脑外伤病人临床资料，建立预后模型，检测模型性能。结果模型组中，预后良好组共 187人，预后不良组共 132人。预后良好组年龄( 53.18±14.81)岁，预后不良组年龄( 59.54±13.69)岁。预后良好组格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分( 10.44±2.43)分，预后不良组 GCS评分( 5.96±2.78)分。预后良好组瞳孔对光反射双侧阳性 83.96%(157/ 187例)一侧阴性 10.70%(20/187例)双侧阴性 5.35%(10/187例)预后不良组瞳孔对光反射双侧阳性 29.55%(39/132例)，一侧阴性 17.，42%(23/132例)，双侧阴性53.，03%(70/132例)。预后良好组，赫尔辛基 CT(HCT)评分(3.17±2.48)分，预后不良组 HCT评分( 7.08±3.11)分。预后良好组抗凝、抗血小板药物服用史 5.88%(11/187例)，预后不良组抗凝、抗血小板药物服用史 13.64%(14/132例)。预后良好组白细胞( 13.58±5.76)×109/L，预后不良组白细胞( 16.92±6.45)×109/L。预后良好组 T3水平( 1.20±0.32) mmol/L，预后不良组 T3水平( 0.91±0.03)mmol/L。逐步回归及多因素分析后，年龄， GCS评分，瞳孔对光反射双侧阴性， HCT评分，抗凝、抗血小板药物服用史，白细胞计数及 T3水平均与预后不良相关。模型 A包括年龄， GCS评分，瞳孔对光反射；模型 B在模型 A的基础上添加 HCT评分及抗凝、抗血小板药物服用史；模型 C在模型 B的基础上添加白细胞计数及 T3水平。随着纳入因素的增多，模型的性能逐渐增强。模型 C是最佳预测模型，经内部验证及外部验证依然有较强性能。结论 T3水平与预后不良成负相关，做为实验室指标与白细胞计数共同纳入脑外伤预后模型可以提高模型的性能。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To explore the feasibility of taking triiodothyronine into the prognostic model of brain injury.Methods The clinical data of 319 cases with neurosurgical trauma treated in Lianyungang Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University from June2018 to May 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, a prognostic model was established, and the performance of the model was tested.Re? sults In 319 cases, there were 187 patients with good prognosis and 132 patients with poor prognosis. Patients in the good prognosisgroup aged (53.18±14.81) years old, and those in the poor prognosis group (59.54±13.69) years old. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ofthe good prognosis group was (10.44±2.43), and that of the poor prognosis group (5.96±2.78). In the good prognosis group, 83.96% (157/187) of the patients had positive pupillary light reflex on both sides, 10.70% (20/187) of the patients had negative pupillary light reflexon one side, and 5.35% (10/187) had negative pupillary light reflex on both sides.In the poor prognosis group, 29.55% (39/132) of thepatients had positive pupillary light reflex on both sides, 17.42% (23/132) of the patients had negative pupillary light reflex on one sideand 53.03% (70/132) had negative pupillary light reflex on both sides. Helsinki CT (HCT) score of the good prognosis group was (3.17±2.48), and that of the poor prognosis group was (7.08±3.11). The history of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drug intake in the good prognosis group was 5.88% (11/187 cases), and that in the poor prognosis group was 13.64% (14/132 cases). The white blood cell counts in thegood and poor prognosis groups were (13.58±5.76) ×109/L, and (16.92±6.45) ×109/L, respectively. The T3 levels in the good and poor prognosis groups were (1.20±0.32) mmol/L, and (0.91±0.03) mmol/L. Stepwise regression and multivariate analysis results showed thatage, GCS score, negative bilateral pupil reflex, HCT score, history of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication, white blood cell countand T3 level were all associated with poor prognosis. Model A included age, GCS score, and pupil reflex to light, model B was addedwith HCT score and anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication history on the basis of model A, and model C added with white blood cellcount and T3 level on the basis of model B. With the increase in included factors, the performance of the models was gradually enhanced. Model C was the best prediction model, which had strong performance after internal and external verification.Conclusion T3 level is negatively correlated with poor prognosis, whose inclusion with white blood cell count in the prognostic model can improve the performance of the model. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
