文章摘要
陈旋.非酒精性脂肪性肝病病人血清长链非编码 NTF3-5水平与胰岛素抵抗的关系[J].安徽医药,2024,28(2):285-289.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病病人血清长链非编码 NTF3-5水平与胰岛素抵抗的关系
The relationship between Lnc-NTF3-5 level and insulin resistance in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2024.02.016
中文关键词: 脂肪肝  非酒精性脂肪肝  长链非编码 NTF3-5  胰岛素抵抗  相关性
英文关键词: Fatty liver  Non-alcoholic fatty liver  Lnc-NTF3-5  Insulin resistance  Correlation
基金项目:
作者单位
陈旋 武汉市蔡甸区人民医院检验科湖北武汉 430000 
摘要点击次数: 920
全文下载次数: 427
中文摘要:
      目的探讨长链非编码 NTF3-5(Lnc-NTF3-5)在非酒精性脂肪性肝病( NAFLD)病人血清中的表达情况,并分析其与胰岛素抵抗的关系。方法选取 2019年 12月至 2020年 12月来武汉市蔡甸区人民医院就诊并确诊为 NAFLD病人 115例为 NAFLD组,根据疾病严重程度分为重度组( 33例),中度组(40例),轻度组( 42例)。同时选取 55例健康者为健康对照组。收集一般资料,分别检测两组血清总胆固醇( TC)三酰甘油(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶( ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(、AST)、谷氨酰基转移酶( GGT)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP),空腹血胰岛素( FINS),血糖(FPG)水平,根据 FINS、FPG计算稳态模型胰岛素抵抗指数( HOMA-IR)及胰岛 β细胞功能指数( HOMA-β);采用实时荧光定量 PCR法对血清中 Lnc-NTF3-5表达水平进行检测, Pearson法分析 Lnc-NTF3-5表达水平与上述肝功能指标和糖脂代谢指标的相关性;受试者操作特征( ROC)曲线评价血清 Lnc-NTF3-5、HOMA-IR对 NAFLD发生的诊断价值。结果 NAFLD组血清中 Lnc-NTF3-5(1.59±0.37比 1.01±0.23)、 HOMA-IR(2.67±0.87比 1.36±0.48)高于健康对照组,且 NAFLD组 Lnc-NTF3-5(2.02±0.43比 1.53±0.37比 1.32±0.31)、 HOMA-IR(3.75±1.23比 2.49±0.81比 1.98±0.64)水平随着疾病严重程度逐渐升高,差异有统计学意义(F=67.41、66.02,P<0.05); NAFLD组 TG[( 3.23±1.02)mmol/L比( 1.13±0.31)mmol/L]、 TC[( 5.15±0.88)mmol/L比( 3.82±1.02) mmol/L]、 LDL-C[( 3.28±0.63)mmol/L比( 2.65±0.31)mmol/L]、 ALT[( 55.33±18.34)U/L比( 24.62±7.95)U/L]、 GGT[( 33.21±10.62) U/L比( 26.94±8.32)U/L]、 AST[( 34.86±11.56)U/L比( 22.32±4.26)U/L]、 FPG[( 5.63±1.02)mmol/L比( 4.99±0.88)mmol/L]、 FINS[( 12.50±6.59)mU/L比( 8.61±1.84)mU/L]、 HOMA-β(4.92±0.80比 4.61±0.67)均显著高于健康对照组, HDL-C[(1.03±0.45)mmol/ L比( 1.32±0.32)mmol/L]低于健康对照组,均差异有统计学意义( t=2.49~14.92,P<0.05);血清 Lnc-NTF3-5和 HOMA-IR均与 HDL-C呈负相关( r=.0.54,P<0.05)(r=.0.61,P<0.05)而与 TG、TC、LDL-C、ALT、GGT、AST、FPG、FINS、HOMA-β均呈正相关( r=0.23、0.22、0.23、0.21、0.53、0.19、0.54、0.55、0.52,P<0.05r=0.45、0.32、0.27、0.23、0.52、0.30、0.52、0.56、0.53,P<0.05); NAFLD病人血清中 Lnc-NTF3-5表达水平和 HOMA-IR呈正相关( r=0.37,P<0.001)。 ROC结果显示, Lnc-NTF3-5、HOMA-IR预测 NAFLD病人的曲线下面积( AUC)分别为[0.85,95%CI:(0.79,0.90); 0.83,95%CI:(0.76,0.88)]对应的灵敏度分别为 72.17%、61.74%)(特异度分别为 89.09%、98.18%,二者联合预测 NAFLD病人的 AUC为 0.88,95%CI:(0.82,0,.93),灵敏度为 76.52%,特异度为 96.36%。结论 NAFLD病人血清中 Lnc-NTF3-5表达水平与 HOMA-IR呈正相关,且二者均与病人肝功能和糖脂代谢有关,具有重要的临床意义。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the expression of long non-coding NTF3-5 (Lnc-NTF3-5) in the serum of patients with non-alco. holic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to analyze its relationship with insulin resistance.Methods Totally 115 patients, who came toCaidian District People's Hospital of Wuhan and were diagnosed with NAFLD during December 2019 to December 2020, were includ.ed as the NAFLD group. According to the severity of the disease, they were grouped into severe group (n=33), moderate group (n=40), and mild group (n=42). Meanwhile, 55 healthy people were chosen as the control group. The general data were collected and the twogroups were detected to collect the levels of serum total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), glutamyltransfer.ase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), fasting insulin (FINS), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), respectively. The homeostasis modelinsulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) and pancreatic β cell function index (HOMA-β) were calculated according to FINS and FPG. Real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR method was performed to measure the expression level of Lnc-NTF3-5 in serum, and Pearson method was performed to analyze the correlation between the expression level of Lnc-NTF3-5 and the above-mentioned liver function indexes and glycolipid metabolism indexes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of se.rum Lnc-NTF3-5 and HOMA-IR for the occurrence of NAFLD.Results The serum levels of Lnc-NTF3-5 (1.59 ± 0.37 vs. 1.01 ± 0.23) and HOMA-IR (2.67 ± 0.87 vs. 1.36 ± 0.48) in NAFLD group were higher than those in the healthy control group, and the levels of Lnc-NTF3-5 (2.02 ± 0.43 vs. 1.53 ± 0.37 vs. 1.32 ± 0.31) and HOMA-IR (3.75 ± 1.23 vs. 2.49 ± 0.81 vs. 1.98 ± 0.64) in NAFLD groups gradually increased with the severity of the disease with statistical significance (F=67.41, 66.02, P<0.05). The levels of TG [(3.23± 1.02) mmol/L vs. (1.13±0.31) mmol/L], TC [(5.15±0.88) mmol/L vs. (3.82±1.02) mmol/L], LDL-C [(3.28±0.63) mmol/L vs. (2.65±0.31) mmol/L], ALT [(55.33±18.34) U/L vs. (24.62±7.95) U/L], GGT [(33.21±10.62) U/L vs. (26.94±8.32) U/L], AST [(34.86±11.56) U/L vs. (22.32±4.26) U/L], FPG [(5.63±1.02) mmol/L vs. (4.99±0.88) mmol/L], FINS [(12.50±6.59) mU/L vs. (8.61±1.84) mU/L], and HOMA-β (4.92±0.80 vs. 4.61±0.67) in the NAFLD group were drastically higher than those in the control group, while the level of HDL-C [(1.03± 0.45) mmol/L vs.(1.32±0.32) mmol/L] in the NAFLD group was lower than that in the control group; the differences were statistically sig. nificant (t=2.49-14.92, P<0.05). Serum Lnc-NTF3-5 and HOMA-IR were inversely correlated with HDL-C(r=.0.54, P<0.05) (r=.0.61, P<0.05), but directly correlated with TG, TC, LDL-C, ALT, GGT, AST, FPG, FINS and HOMA-β(r=0.23, 0.22, 0.23, 0.21, 0.53, 0.19, 0.54, 0.55, 0.52, P<0.05) (r=0.45, 0.32, 0.27, 0.23, 0.52, 0.30, 0.52, 0.56, 0.53, P<0.05). The expression level of Lnc-NTF3-5 in serum of NAFLD patients was directly correlated with HOMA-IR (r=0.37, P<0.001). ROC results showed that the areas under the curve (AUC) predicted by Lnc-NTF3-5 and HOMA-IR for NAFLD patients were [0.85, 95% CI: (0.79, 0.90)] and [0.83, 95% CI: (0.76, 0.88)],respectively. The sensitivities were 72.17% and 61.74%, and the specificities were 89.09% and 98.18%. The AUC of the combinationof the two for NAFLD patients was [0.88, 95% CI: (0.82, 0.93)], the sensitivity 76.52%, and the specificity 96.36%.Conclusion The expression level of Lnc-NTF3-5 in the serum of NAFLD patients is directly correlated with HOMA-IR, and both are correlated with the liver function and glycolipid metabolism of the patients, which has important clinical significance.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮