| 刘双虎,宋浩明,李焕,等.不同强度运动干预对原发性高血压病人血压、心肺耐力的影响[J].安徽医药,2025,29(5):1006-1017. |
| 不同强度运动干预对原发性高血压病人血压、心肺耐力的影响 |
| Effects of different intensity exercise intervention on blood pressure and cardiopulmonary endurance in patients with essential hypertension |
| |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2025.05.030 |
| 中文关键词: 高血压 运动干预 血压 心肺耐力 血脂 心理 |
| 英文关键词: Hypertension Exercise intervention Blood pressure Cardiopulmonary endurance Blood lipid Psychology |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 64 |
| 全文下载次数: 135 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的探讨不同强度运动干预对原发性高血压病人血压、心肺耐力的影响。方法选取 2021年 8―12月在沧州市人民医院就诊的原发性高血压病人 48例，其中 32例病人进行常规药物合并运动干预治疗为研究组， 16例病人进行常规药物治疗为对照组。研究组按照运动干预方式分为低强度持续有氧运动组( A组)和高强度间歇运动组( B组)两个亚组，每组 16例病人。干预持续 8周，分别在干预前、干预后检测两组病人血压、心肺耐力、血脂水平及心理状态的变化情况。结果干预后对照组、 A组、 B组 24 h平均收缩压［( 145.63±5.32)mmHg、(140.25±4.77)mmHg、(135.19±4.92)mmHg比( 149.19±5.71)mmHg(149.31±5.02)mmHg、(150.00±5.82)mmHg］、 24 h平均舒张压［( 86.81±8.76)mmHg、(84.31±9.00)mmHg、(79.88±9.58)mmHg比(88.56±9.28)mmHg、(88.13±10.22)mmHg、(87.50±13.60)mmHg］、白天平均收缩压、收缩压负荷、舒张压负荷均低于干预前( P<0.05)，B组病人干预后 24 h平均收缩压、白天平均收缩压、晨峰血压改善优于 A组( P<0.05)；与干预前比较，干预后 A、B两组病人无氧阈公斤摄氧量、峰值公斤摄氧量明显升高( P<0.05)，A、B两组三酰甘油、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白、葡萄糖、糖化血红蛋白水平明显降低(P<0.05)，改善程度均优于对照组；相较于对照组，两种运动方式干预后病人抑郁症状群和广泛性焦虑量表评分均明显降低(P<0.05)；干预过程中，病人均未发生恶性心律失常或明显心肌缺血症状，运动过程中无收缩压进行性下降及异常升高。结论高强度间歇运动可帮助原发性高血压病人控制血压，提高心肺耐力，降低血脂水平，且干预过程无不良反应事件发生，应用安全性理想。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To investigate the impacts of exercise intervention with different intensity on blood pressure, and cardiopulmo-nary endurance in patients with primary hypertension.Methods A total of 48 patients with essential hypertension were included inthe Cangzhou People's Hospital from August to December 2021. Among them, 32 patients were treated with conventional drugs com-bined with exercise intervention as the study group, and 16 patients were treated with conventional drugs as the control group. Accord-ing to the exercise intervention, they were assigned into two subgroups: low-intensity continuous aerobic exercise group (group A) and high-intensity intermittent exercise group (group B), with 16 patients in each group. The intervention lasted for 8 weeks. The changes ofblood pressure, cardiopulmonary endurance, blood lipid level and psychological state of the two groups were detected before and afterintervention.Results After intervention, the 24 h mean systolic blood pressure [(145.63±5.32) mmHg, (140.25±4.77) mmHg, (135.19± 4.92) mmHg vs. (149.19±5.71) mmHg, (149.31±5.02) mmHg, (150.00±5.82) mmHg], 24 h mean diastolic blood pressure [(86.81±8.76)mmHg,(84.31±9.00) mmHg, (79.88±9.58) mmHg vs. (88.56±9.28) mmHg, (88.13±10.22) mmHg, (87.50±13.60) mmHg], daytime meansystolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure load and diastolic blood pressure load of the three groups were lower than those beforeintervention (P<0.05). The improvement of 24 h mean systolic blood pressure, daytime mean systolic blood pressure and morning peakblood pressure in group B were better than those in group A (P<0.05); after intervention, the anaerobic threshold kg oxygen uptake and peak kg oxygen uptake of patients in groups A and B increased significantly compared with before intervention (P<0.05), and the levelsof triglyceride, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein, glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin in groups A and B decreased significantly(P<0.05), and the improvement degree was better than that of control group; compared with the control group, the scores of depressivesymptom clusters and generalized anxiety scale were significantly decreased after the intervention of the two exercise modes (P<0.05).During the intervention, the patients did not have malignant arrhythmia or obvious myocardial ischemia symptoms, and there was noprogressive decrease or abnormal increase of systolic blood pressure during exercise.Conclusion High intensity intermittent exercisecan help patients with essential hypertension control blood pressure, improve cardiopulmonary endurance, lower blood lipid, and thereis no adverse reaction event in the intervention process, so the application is safe. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
