| 许力新,刘小彦,范彦蓉,等.综合性心理干预对抑郁症住院患者一级亲属心理健康状况的影响[J].安徽医药,2018,22(6):1130-1133. |
| 综合性心理干预对抑郁症住院患者一级亲属心理健康状况的影响 |
| Influence of comprehensive psychological intervention on mental health status of first-degree relatives of in patients with depression |
| 投稿时间：2016-08-31 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 抑郁症 心理疗法 健康状况 一级亲属 |
| 英文关键词: Depressive disorder Psychotherapy Health status First-degree relatives |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2266 |
| 全文下载次数: 494 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 探讨综合性心理干预对抑郁症住院患者一级亲属心理健康状况的影响作用。 方法 纳入2014年6月至2015年12月于石家庄市第八医院住院的抑郁症患者一级亲属300例,采用随机数字表法将一级亲属分为干预组和非干预组,每组均为150例,对干预组进行为期8周的综合性心理干预,非干预组仅给予病情告知,采用症状自评量表(symptom check list-90,SCL-90)在心理干预前后分别对两组的心理状况进行前瞻性研究。 结果 在综合性心理干预前,干预组人际关系敏感因子(1.78±0.64)分、恐怖因子(1.26±0.43)分、总分(136.77±18.69)分；非干预组分别是(1.79±0.59)分、(1.25±0.44)分、(134.63±17.54)分,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.141,0.200,1.018,P>0.05)。在综合心理干预后,干预组人际关系敏感因子(1.60±0.61)分、恐怖因子(1.12±0.36)分、总分(127.72±15.20) 分,非干预组分别为(1.78±0.70)分、(1.27±0.32)分、(135.16±18.16)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.368,P＜0.05；t=3.846,P＜0.01； t=3.826, P＜0.01)。 其他各因子在干预前后,两组均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 综合性心理干预对抑郁症住院患者一级亲属心理状况具有明显影响,对缓解其负面情绪具有重要意义。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To investigate the effect of comprehensive psychological intervention on mental health status of first-degree relatives of patients with depression. Methods Three hundred cases of first-degree relatives of hospitalized patients with depression in Department of Psychiatrics in The Eighth Hospital of Shijiazhuang from June 2014 to December 2015 were included and randomly assigned into intervention group and non-intervention group,with 150 cases in each group,according to the random number table method.The intervention group was given 8 weeks of comprehensive psychological intervention,while the non-intervention group was only given the condition to inform.The psychological status of the two groups was prospectively investigated before and after the psychological intervention using the symptom check list-90 (SCL-90). Results Before the comprehensive psychological intervention,in the intervention group,interpersonal sensitivity factor(1.78±0.64),the scores of terror factor(1.26±0.43),Total score(136.77±18.69)；The non-intervention groups are(1.79±0.59,1.25±0.44,134.63±17.54),There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(t=0.141,0.200,1.018,P>0.05) There was no statistical difference between the two groups(P>0.05)； After the comprehensive psychological intervention, There was no significant change in the scores of factors in noninterventional groups(P>0.05)；the score of each factor in the non-intervention group had no significant change. In the intervention group, interpersonal sensitivity factorthe scores of terror factor(1.60±0.61,t=3.846,P<0.01), the scores of terror factorinterpersonal sensitivity factor(1.12±0.36,t=2.368,P<0.05), and total score(127.72±15.20,t=3.826,P<0.01),The non-intervention groups are(1.78±0.70,1.27±0.32,135.16±18.16),The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(t=2.368,P＜0.05；t=3.846,P＜0.01； t=3.826,P＜0.01)；All the other factors had no statistical significance before and after the intervention(P>0.05). Conclusions The comprehensive psychological intervention has significant impact on the psychological status of the first-degree relatives of patients with depression,and it has important significance to alleviate the negative emotions of the first-degree relatives of patients with depression. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
