文章摘要
杨长青,邵松.显微目镜辅助通道下微创经椎间孔入路椎间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病 40例[J].安徽医药,2020,24(5):915-920.
显微目镜辅助通道下微创经椎间孔入路椎间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病 40例
Clinical study of MIS?TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases under microscopic eyepiece assisted channels
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009?6469.2020.05.017
中文关键词: 脊柱疾病  脊柱融合术  外科手术,微创性  显微目镜  加速康复外科
英文关键词: Spinal diseases  Spinal fusion  Surgical procedures,minimally invasive  Microscopic eyepiece  Enhanced re?covery after surgery
基金项目:安徽省卫生和计划生育委员会科研计划项目( 2016QK042)
作者单位E-mail
杨长青 安徽医科大学附属六安医院骨科安徽六安 237005  
邵松 安徽医科大学附属六安医院骨科安徽六安 237005 1255319122@qq.com 
摘要点击次数: 1703
全文下载次数: 886
中文摘要:
      目的通过与经椎间孔入路椎间融合术( TLIF)比较,探讨显微目镜辅助 Quadrant通道下微创经椎间孔入路椎间融合术(MIS?TLIF)治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析 2015年 1月至 2017年 12月安徽医科大学附属六安医院收治的腰椎退变性疾病病人 87例,按手术方法分为 MIS?TLIF组( 40例)和 TLIF组( 47例)。 MIS?TLIF组采用 Quadrant可扩张通道联合目镜下直视技术。比较两组病人的围手术期及随访资料,采用视觉模拟评分( Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)及 Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)评价两组病人的腰痛及下肢痛情况。采用影像学动态 X片评价椎间融合情况。结果 87例病人均顺利完成手术,无明显并发症。 MIS?TLIF组手术时间( 97.33±5.413)min长于 TLIF组( 81.36±5.054)min,术中透视次数(6.15±0.86)次多于 TLIF组( 4.26±0.71)次,差异有统计学意义( t=14.211,11.257,均 P<0.001); MIS?TLIF组术中出血量及术后引流量少于 TLIF组,且术后下地时间和住院时间少于 TLIF组,差异有统计学意义( t=-37.458,-16.923,-16.220,-8.299,均 P<0.001);两组病人术后腰痛、下肢痛 VAS评分及 ODI评分均较术前明显降低,差异有统计学意义(均 P<0.01);术后 3 d MIS? TLIF组腰痛缓解明显优于 TLIF组[VAS(1.80±0.61)比( 3.01±0.68)分]差异有统计学意义( P<0.001);术后 3d下肢痛 VAS评分、术后 1年腰痛、下肢痛 VAS评分差异无统计学意义(均 P>0.05);1月、术后 1年 ODI评分差异无统计学意义(均 P>术后,0.05)其中术后 1月 ODI评分差异无统计学意义( P=0.064)。结论采用显微目镜辅助通道下 MIS?TLIF技术治疗腰椎退变性疾病达到与 TLIF手术相同的疗效,且创伤更小,卧床时间更短,术后病人腰痛缓解更显著,有利于病人恢复及早期功能锻可以,
英文摘要:
      Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive interbody fusion(MIS?TLIF)in the treatment of lum? bar degenerative diseases by comparing the(TLIF)with the transforaminal interbody fusion(TLIF)via the Quadrant channel un? der microscope and eyepiece?assisted minimally invasive interbody fusion(MIS?TLIF)in the treatment of lumbar degenerative dis? eases.Methods 87 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases admitted in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2017 wereretrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into MIS?TLIF group(n=40)and TLIF group(n=47)according to the opera?tion method.The patients in the MIS?TLIF group were treated with Quadrant expandable channel combined with eyepiece direct vi?sion technique.The perioperative and follow?up data of the two groups were compared.Visual analogue score(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)and Oswestry dysfunction index(Oswestry disability i)were used.Ndex,ODI was used to evaluate the low back painand lower limb pain in the two groups.Dynamic X?ray imaging was used to evaluate interbody fusion.Results 87 patients success? fully completed the operation without obvious complications.The mean operative time in the MIS?TLIF group(97.33±5.413)min was longer than that in the TLIF group(81.36±5.054)min,and the times of intraoperative fluoroscopy(6.15±0.86)times were more than those in the TLIF group(4.26±0.71)times,the differences were statistically significant(t=14.211,11.257,all P<0.001).The intraoperative bleeding volume and postoperative drainage volume in the MIS?TLIF group were less than those in theTLIF group,and the duration of operation and hospitalization in the TLIF group were less than those in the TLIF group.The differ?ence was statistically significant(t=37.458,16.923,16.220,8.299,P<0.001).VAS score and ODI score of postoperative lowerback pain and lower limb pain in the two groups were significantly lower than those before surgery,with statistically significant dif?ferences(all P<0.01).The relief of lumbago in the MIS?TLIF group was significantly better than that in the TLIF group on the 3rd day after surgery[VAS(1.80±0.61)vs.(3.01±0.68)],the difference was statistically significant(P<0.001).There was no signifi? cant difference in VAS scores of lower limb pain 3 days after surgery,lower back pain and lower limb pain 1 year after surgery(all P>0.05).There was no significant difference in ODI scores between 1 month and 1 year after surgery(P>0.05).There was no sig? nificant difference in ODI scores at 1 month postoperatively(P=0.064).Conclusion the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseas?es with MIS?TLIF under microscope eyepiece can achieve the same curative effect as TLIF operation,and the trauma is less,the du? ration of stay in bed is shorter,and the patients’lumbago relief is more remarkable after operation.It is beneficial to patients’re? covery and early functional exercise,which is consistent with the concept of accelerated rehabilitation surgery(ERAS).
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮